.jpg)
Go to time = 11:58:47 on video part 2 HERE FOR DEPOSITION
"...because the entire house, this Congressional-woman's house was bugged..."
HERE ARE THE PICTURES DISCUSSED
-------
UPDATE AUGUST 29, 2009 Bisexual Congresswoman Blackmailed, House Bugged
UPDATE AUGUST 29, 2009 Identification of the Enemy is the First Step
UPDATE SEPT 12, 2009 Found the vid below at 911blogger
UPDATE SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 Pentagon backs massive missile sale to Turkey
-----------
UPDATE SEPT 24, 2009 The Congresswoman in question, according to Edmonds, is Illinois' 9th-district Rep. Jan Schakowsky.
To me the tragedy is that somebody actually "has something" on a woman because she is bisexual. Why is that anyone's business anyway? If they publicized it I'm not watching it. I don't care at all. Zero.
ReplyDeleteHow is this blackmailable info in this country - and if the house is "bugged" we have another big problem.
Big Problem: If the FBI knows a U.S. Congressperson is being bugged why haven't they warned the Congressperson and protected said Congressperson from blackmail?
Seems to me the FBI not only doesn't serve the people - they really don't serve the Congress - that is - as far as the best interests of the hand that feeds them. (Interpretation for FBI people this means the American public - that is where your paycheck comes from)
"Bi-Sexuality" Is Anti-Social Obsession, Psychosis Rejected By Christian Volk
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 31 Aug 09)
Of course, "JackRabbit," u don't see anything wrong w. someone's being "bi-sexual"--as u're Jew, and this is the typical Jew mentality and religion--but which u want to pretend is NOT "religious."
For bi-sexuality is an obsession and indulgence held to being anti-social among Christian and gentile volk who made USA.
CONCLUSION: Thus it's public "business" for this bi-sexuality as it dis-credits whoever is bi-sexual--such is ur will-ful ignorance which once again emphasizes ur basic foreigness and alienation to Christian people of USA in which nation u do not belong and must be removed. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
i still don't care
ReplyDeleteJew Doesn't Care--And That's His Alien "Religion" He Wants To Impose
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 31 Aug 09)
Right--that's ur Jew religion to being narcissist and not caring--but esp. to push it in people's face that u "don't care." U're a Jew, an alien, and a foreigner--u must be removed. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Appoll above said:
ReplyDeleteU're a Jew, an alien, and a foreigner--u must be removed.
I suppose that's progress since not too long ago you wanted to exterminate me.
Why did you respond to the ignoramus?
ReplyDeleteTo anon above Sept 11, 2009 8:50 - I suppose you are speaking of Appoll - forgive me if I am wrong - the comment debate starts on the Barney Frank story prior to this post -
ReplyDeleteRegardless of a commenter's position I should be able to present my own case and let the reader draw their own conclusions.
I feel that it is my duty to respond to commenters since they took the time to read my posting. The comments are the best part of this exercise.
Jew Would Prefer To Lose The Dialectic Than To Respond And Thereby Verify The Indictment
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 13 Sep 09)
"Anon" at 8:50pm, u say I'm "ignoramus," but that's only because u, obviously, are a Jew, and u want to pretend it isn't legitimate to criticise Jews, who are Talmudists, murderers of truth.
Hence u say pretend it's "ignorant" to criticise and characterize Jews as Talmudic murderers, beginning w. murder of the Truth. See RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo.
CONCLUSION: And as "JackRabbit" indicates, it would look bad for the dialectic if u were un-able to give an answer or response. Of course for u Jews, that's better, not to answer, than to respond and then look bad for the dialectic, isn't it? Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Hey Appollonian,
ReplyDeletePlease speak for yourself - not on my behalf. I noticed you called the commenter a Jew as you called me a Jew. Both gratuitous assertions which can be equally gratuitously denied. As usual you lose again.
Un-Caring Jewwy Child Doesn't Understand Logic--Which He Justifies Brilliantly
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 15 Sep 09)
"JackRabbit," what makes u think I wasn't speaking for myself, dipshit?--the heck w. u. Calling u and ur Jew friend a Jew is reasonable conclusion based upon inductive logic which ur child's mentality ("I don't care") evidently fails to understand. Yes, I know u don't care.
CONCLUSION: And of course u can deny anything u want to deny--after all, it's ur blog isn't it? "Lose again"?--how? U're just a childish little Jew, and despite ur denials, u demonstrate ur Jewwy mentality quite well. And my inductive technique is well justified. Yes, I know u don't care--but who cares? Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Appollonia:
ReplyDeleteYou sound angry. Hate can do that to a person. You seem to be a sore loser. Name-calling, which you've unfortunately used as a last resort - is - alas - making your logic look even better. Is name calling part of your inductive technique? It's also funny how you can "not care" but I can't "not care." Back around in a circle again.
Point Is Informative, Substantial Dialectic
ReplyDelete(Apollonian, 16 Sep 09)
"JackRabbit," like typical Jew, u project according to ur subjectivist wishful thinking. And speaking in idiotic cliche's as u do regarding "hate," further demonstrates ur Jewwiness.
For "hate" is mere aversion, reciprocal of attraction, varying only then in intensity--a normal emotion. If u don't "hate," u don't love, dumbass.
And "name-calling" is actually mere characterization, no less than "Jew." And that's another Jew characteristic, disputing the existence of reality. Jews love to lie, like u, "JackRabbit."
CONCLUSION: And note, I don't expect to persuade a Jew like urself; I only work to achieve an informative, quality dialectic, never doubt. Thus I make my efforts for our dialectics with all confidence. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian